Nerman Fatic vs Christopher Heyman Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
N. Fatic vs C. Heyman

Nerman Fatic

BIH

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

6'3" (191 cm)

Height

6'3" (191 cm)

214

C. Rank

812

191

Best Rank

258

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$74.0K

Career Money

Right-Handed

Plays

Left-Handed

Christopher Heyman

BEL

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

6'3" (191 cm)

Height

6'3" (191 cm)

214

C. Rank

812

191

Best Rank

258

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$74.0K

Career Money

Right-Handed

Plays

Left-Handed

Head-to-head: Fatic 1 - 0 Heyman

They have played 3 sets in total, with Nerman Fatic winning 2 and Christopher Heyman winning 1. The last match between Nerman Fatic and Christopher Heyman was at the Bosnia & Herzegovina F1, 27-05-2013, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Nerman Fatic getting the victory 6-7(2) 6-3 6-2.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Fatic	1
Heyman	0

Last 1 H2H Matches:

(R1) Bosnia & Herzegovina F1(05-27-13)

Stats

Nerman Fatic

Christopher Heyman

N. Fatic vs C. Heyman H2H Profile

N. Fatic	Stats	C. Heyman
$73,995	Career Prize Money	$0
58.47% (404-287)	Career Total W/L	63.65% (352-201)
1	Clay	0
12	Titles	19
1	Total H2H Matches	0
0.00% (0-1)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

N. Fatic vs C. Heyman Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Nerman Fatic has won 44.18% of points on their second serve, while Christopher Heyman has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Nerman Fatic, in recent form, has won 45.34% of their opponent's second serve points, while Christopher Heyman has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 28.45% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Nerman Fatic has saved 54.12% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Christopher Heyman has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Nerman Fatic has won 73.91% of matches played (W/L 51/18), with Christopher Heyman winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Nerman Fatic has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 61% (W/L 341/218), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/2). Christopher Heyman has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 113/58), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 58% (W/L 42/31).
Player level: In the last year, Nerman Fatic has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 64.10% of matches (W/L 25/14), where as Christopher Heyman has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Nerman Fatic winning 1 times and Christopher Heyman being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Nerman Fatic winning 2 and Christopher Heyman winning 1.
The last match between Nerman Fatic and Christopher Heyman was at the Bosnia & Herzegovina F1, 27-05-2013, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Nerman Fatic getting the victory 6-7(2) 6-3 6-2.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Nerman Fatic has played against opponents with an average rank of 338.61 while Christopher Heyman has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Nerman Fatic has won 84% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Christopher Heyman has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Nerman Fatic has converted 33.71% of breakpoint opportunities, and Christopher Heyman has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Nerman Fatic vs Christopher Heyman Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

N. Fatic vs C. Heyman H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

N. Fatic	Stats	C. Heyman
1	H2H Matches Won	0
2	Sets Won	1
18	Games Won	12
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
100% (1/1)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	Deciding Set Win %	0% (0/1)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/1)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	100% (1/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/0)

Recent Performance Stats

N. Fatic Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Bergamo Challenger - 17-11-2025
R2 Federico ArnaboldiF. Arnaboldi	L	7-5 4-6 7-5	Stats
R1 Fabrizio AndaloroF. Andaloro	W	6-4 6-6 ret.	Stats
Helsinki Challenger - 03-11-2025
R1 Calvin HemeryC. Hemery	L	6-3 7-6(4)	Stats
M15 Bol - 20-10-2025
R2 Marko MiladinovicM. Miladinovic	L	7-6(2) ret.	Stats
R1 Antonio VoljavecA. Voljavec	W	6-2 6-3	Stats

View All

C. Heyman Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Ottignies-Louvain-la-Neuve Challenger - 23-01-2023
Q1 Tibo ColsonT. Colson	L	6-3 7-6(4)	Stats
M15 Lodz - 25-07-2022
R2 Kristjan TammK. Tamm	L	6-4 6-2	Stats
R1 Adrien GobatA. Gobat	W	6-1 6-3	Stats
M25 Marburg - 04-07-2022
R2 Sidane PontjodikromoS. Pontjodikromo	L	7-5 6-4	Stats
R1 Philip SekulicP. Sekulic	W	4-1 ret.	Stats

View All

N. Fatic vs C. Heyman Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

N. Fatic	Stats	C. Heyman
58.47% (404/287)	YTD Win/Loss	63.65% (352/201)
57.49% (890/658)	Sets Win/Loss	60.44% (767/502)
53.03% (7602/6734)	Games Win/Loss	54.57% (6451/5370)
51.19% (43/41)	Hard Win/Loss	66.08% (113/58)
61.00% (341/218)	Clay Win/Loss	61.11% (154/98)
43.48% (20/26)	Indoor Hard W/L	65.38% (85/45)
0.00% (0/2)	Grass Win/Loss	0% (0/0)
0.23	Aces Per Game	0.2
1598	Aces Total	1139
0.22	Double Faults Per Game	0.15
1517	Total Double Faults	887
1:20:1	Average Match Time	1:18:55
509.29	Average Opponent Rank	560.41
66% (23791/35820)	1st Serve %	69% (19517/28466)
65% (15579/23791)	1st Serve Win %	68% (13201/19517)
48% (5772/12029)	2nd Serve Win %	52% (4639/8949)
47% (1969/4222)	Break Points Won % (Total)	46% (1323/2869)
43% (15618/36165)	Return Points Win %	41% (11509/28052)
20.00% (1/4)	Slam W/L	0% (0/0)
0.00% (0/1)	Masters W/L	0% (0/0)
40.00% (4/6)	Cups W/L	0% (0/0)
25.00% (3/9)	Main Tour W/L	0% (0/0)
52.89% (119/106)	Challenger W/L	40.00% (26/39)
63.24% (277/161)	Futures W/L	66.80% (326/162)
60% (394/662)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	64% (343/540)
0% (0/3)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	40% (2/5)
51% (79/156)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	51% (86/169)
54% (102/189)	Deciding Set Win %	60% (99/166)
88% (394/348)	1st Set Won, Won Match	89% (339/301)
11% (394/42)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	11% (339/38)
19% (297/57)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	24% (214/51)